A war of words has erupted between Fadzai Mahere, a lawyer and politician, and George Charamba, Zimbabwe’s Deputy Chief Secretary (Presidential Communications). The heated exchange began when Charamba described Mahere as the worst candidate to succeed Nelson Chamisa, the former leader of the Citizens Coalition for Change.
Mahere swiftly responded, expressing her deep concern over Charamba’s sincerity in shaping political discourse. She questioned his motives, asking why he would demand an endorsement from someone he deemed flawed. Mahere also criticized Charamba’s approach, labeling it as “malicious, dirty, and based on hate”.¹
The exchange took a personal turn when Mahere brought up Charamba’s past, including allegations of involvement in shady deals at the Premier Service Medical Aid Society (PSMAS) and a reported incident of domestic violence in 2005.
Mahere’s response was not only a defense of her own character but also a call to action for Zimbabweans to demand more from their leaders. She emphasized the need for constructive criticism and accountability, rather than personal attacks and character assassination.
The incident highlights the intense political climate in Zimbabwe, where personal attacks and mudslinging have become commonplace. As the country navigates its complex political landscape, leaders like Mahere are pushing for a more nuanced and respectful approach to political discourse.
ends//..
